곤곤곤 [529107] · MS 2014 · 쪽지

2014-12-04 19:02:23
조회수 377

[영어] 16. 빈칸

게시글 주소: https://old.orbi.kr/0005168694

Two types of language exist. There is one that never allows a single change in letter in order to successfully deliver a speech and be able to communicate. The other is the one that only sometimes permits change in letters or structure. The intersect between English and French words are almost fantastic in nature, where nature is Latin. Words like 'orange' are exactly the same but words like 'bleu' in French may not be as familiar to an average Englishman but can most certainly get one's point across. In the Gaulish language during the Roman Empire, it was possible to alter the structure in almost any way: I love you, you I love, I you love, etc. But that is clearly not how the English puts it. They have_________. So it is not very clear whether a language is 'flexible' or not - it really depends in what aspect one observes it.
.1. loose structure but stiff vocabulary
.2. almost the same structure as the French and other Northern European countries
.3. many methods to place words into phrases and sentences
.4. a rigid structure that only allows a particular type of word to behave flexibly
.5. derived from the Latin language and therefore the Gaulish, which as the rudiment of 'nature'

사실Gaulish는 안그랫다지요..

http://m.blog.naver.com/07kimsg/220166657718

0 XDK (+0)

  1. 유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.


  • 첫번째 댓글의 주인공이 되어보세요.